آنتونی رابینز میگه : من در 40 سالگی به جایی رسیدم که برای رسیدن بهش 82 سال زمان لازمه و این رو مدیون کتاب خواندن زیاد هستم.
زبان فایل : انگلیسی
نوع فایل : PDF
The first essay in this volume A Devil s Chaplain (1.1) has not previously been published. The title borrowed by the book is explained in the essay itself. The second essay What is True? (1.2) was my contribution to a symposium of that name in Forbes ASAP magazine. Scientists tend to take a robust view of truth and are impatient of philosophical equivocation over its reality or importance. It s hard enough coaxing nature to give up her truths without spectators and hangers-on strewing gratuitous obstacles in our way. My essay argues that we should at least be consistent. Truths about everyday life are just as much – or as little – open to philosophical doubt as scientific truths. Let us shun double standards. At times I fear turning into a double standards bore. It started in child- hood when my first hero Doctor Dolittle (he returned irresistibly to mind when I read the Naturalist s Voyage of my adult hero Charles Darwin) raised my consciousness to borrow a useful piece of feminist jargon about our treatment of animals. Non-human animals I should say for of course we are animals. The moral philosopher most justly credited with raising today s consciousness in this direction is Peter Singer lately moved from Australia to Princeton. His The Great Ape Project aims towards granting the other great apes as near as is practically possible civil rights equivalent to those enjoyed by the human great ape. When you stop and ask yourself why this seems so immediately ridiculous the harder you think the less ridiculous it seems. Cheap cracks like I suppose you ll need reinforced ballot-boxes for gorillas then? are soon dispatched: we give rights but not the vote to children lunatics and Members of the House of Lords. The biggest objection to the GAP is Where will it all end? Rights for oysters? (Bertrand Russell s quip in a similar context). Where do you draw the line? Gaps in the Mind (1.3) my own contribution to the GAP book uses an evolutionary argument to show that we should not be in the business of drawing lines in the first place. There s no law of nature that says boundaries have to be clear-cut.
نقد و بررسیها
هیچ دیدگاهی برای این محصول نوشته نشده است.